PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSQ vs. ZS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSQ vs. ZS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -42.54% return.


PSQ

1D
-1.51%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-13.33%
6M
-11.75%
1Y
-23.25%
3Y*
-18.03%
5Y*
-13.88%
10Y*
-19.02%

ZS

1D
-1.17%
1M
-15.04%
YTD
-42.54%
6M
-47.22%
1Y
-57.35%
3Y*
-5.02%
5Y*
-7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQ vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-13.33%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%7.84%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
-42.54%24.67%-18.57%98.00%-65.18%60.90%329.48%18.59%18.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQ and ZS is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018

-0.56

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PSQ and ZS has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.56 to -0.34, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSQ vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

ZS
ZS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQ vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSQZSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.89

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.84

-1.59

-0.25

PSQ vs. ZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the ZS Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQ and ZS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSQZSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.39

-0.98

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

-0.14

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

0.31

-1.07

Drawdowns

PSQ vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and ZS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSQZSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.26%

-76.41%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.86%

-64.89%

+38.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-64.89%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.91%

-76.41%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.19%

-64.95%

-33.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.99%

-32.63%

-41.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

36.05%

-23.42%

Volatility

PSQ vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 6.66%, while Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a volatility of 44.44%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSQZSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

44.44%

-37.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

57.30%

-44.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

58.72%

-41.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

56.10%

-33.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

58.42%

-36.11%

Dividends

PSQ vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison

PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, while ZS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
5.05%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%
ZS
Zscaler, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSQ and ZS have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZS has higher volatility (44.44%) compared to PSQ (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs ZS's -76.41%.

ZS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSQ and ZS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer