PSQ vs. ZS
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while ZS (Zscaler, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PSQ returned -13.88%/yr vs -7.99%/yr for ZS. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PSQ vs. ZS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -42.54% return.
PSQ
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -11.75%
- 1Y
- -23.25%
- 3Y*
- -18.03%
- 5Y*
- -13.88%
- 10Y*
- -19.02%
ZS
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -15.04%
- YTD
- -42.54%
- 6M
- -47.22%
- 1Y
- -57.35%
- 3Y*
- -5.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
PSQ vs. ZS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -13.33% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | 7.84% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | -42.54% | 24.67% | -18.57% | 98.00% | -65.18% | 60.90% | 329.48% | 18.59% | 18.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and ZS is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018 | -0.56 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PSQ and ZS has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.56 to -0.34, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. ZS — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
ZS
PSQ vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.89 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.59 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.39 | -0.98 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.62 | -0.14 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.31 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and ZS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -76.41% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.86% | -64.89% | +38.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -64.89% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -76.41% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.19% | -64.95% | -33.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -32.63% | -41.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 36.05% | -23.42% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 6.66%, while Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) has a volatility of 44.44%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | ZS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 44.44% | -37.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.15% | 57.30% | -44.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 58.72% | -41.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 56.10% | -33.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 58.42% | -36.11% |
Dividends
PSQ vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, while ZS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.05% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and ZS have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZS has higher volatility (44.44%) compared to PSQ (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs ZS's -76.41%.
ZS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and ZS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer