PSQ vs. QID
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QID is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -18.11%/yr vs -37.16%/yr for QID. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
PSQ vs. QID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -9.10% return, which is significantly higher than QID's -19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has outperformed QID with an annualized return of -18.11%, while QID has yielded a comparatively lower -37.16% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -9.10%
- 1Y
- -14.62%
- 3Y*
- -14.68%
- 5Y*
- -11.51%
- 10Y*
- -18.11%
- ALL TIME*
- -16.35%
QID
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- 6M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- -19.33%
- 1Y
- -30.61%
- 3Y*
- -32.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.56%
- 10Y*
- -37.16%
- ALL TIME*
- -34.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $226.44M | $186.83M | $214.02M | |
| $241.39M | $204.00M | $315.37M |
PSQ vs. QID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -9.10% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -19.33% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and QID is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | 0.99 |
The correlation between PSQ and QID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSQ vs. QID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSQ
QID
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSQ
QID
Basic Materials
PSQ
-
QID
-
Communication Services
PSQ
-
QID
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSQ
-
QID
-
Consumer Defensive
PSQ
-
QID
-
Energy
PSQ
-
QID
-
Healthcare
PSQ
-
QID
-
Industrials
PSQ
-
QID
-
Real Estate
PSQ
-
QID
-
Technology
PSQ
-
QID
-
Utilities
PSQ
-
QID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. QID — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
QID
PSQ vs. QID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.69 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | -1.29 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. QID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QID drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and QID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -99.99% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.83% | -44.65% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -79.50% | +29.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -88.72% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.66% | -99.21% | +11.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.10% | -99.99% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.13% | -87.08% | +12.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.54% | 23.84% | -11.30% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. QID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 6.71%, while ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 13.35% | -6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 31.15% | -15.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 38.01% | -19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 45.68% | -22.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 44.91% | -22.48% |
PSQ vs. QID - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSQ and QID have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
PSQ vs. QID - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than QID's 7.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.22% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.31% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, PSQ and QID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QID has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to PSQ (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs QID's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, PSQ leads with -18.11% vs -37.16% for QID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PSQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -18.11% return vs -37.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSQ and QID have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.31%, compared with 4.22% for PSQ.
PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QID is Leveraged Equities. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%).
PSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and QID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer