PSQ vs. SPXU
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -18.89%/yr vs -41.43%/yr for SPXU. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
PSQ vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -14.61% return, which is significantly higher than SPXU's -26.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has outperformed SPXU with an annualized return of -18.89%, while SPXU has yielded a comparatively lower -41.43% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- YTD
- -14.61%
- 1Y
- -21.29%
- 3Y*
- -17.50%
- 5Y*
- -12.87%
- 10Y*
- -18.89%
SPXU
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -22.51%
- YTD
- -26.27%
- 1Y
- -42.27%
- 3Y*
- -41.31%
- 5Y*
- -33.63%
- 10Y*
- -41.43%
PSQ vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -14.61% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -26.27% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and SPXU is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PSQ and SPXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSQ vs. SPXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSQ
SPXU
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSQ
SPXU
Basic Materials
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Communication Services
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Consumer Defensive
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Energy
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Healthcare
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Industrials
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Real Estate
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Technology
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Utilities
PSQ
-
SPXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
SPXU
PSQ vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.95 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | -1.66 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -99.99% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.83% | -43.83% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -84.36% | +34.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -90.23% | +29.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.94% | -99.56% | +11.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.21% | -99.99% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.08% | -93.35% | +19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.80% | 25.04% | -13.24% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 8.64%, while ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 13.32% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 29.88% | -14.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 37.43% | -18.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 50.64% | -27.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 53.33% | -30.95% |
PSQ vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQ vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than SPXU's 7.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.49% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.04% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PSQ and SPXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXU has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to PSQ (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs SPXU's -99.99%.
On 10-year performance, PSQ leads with -18.89% vs -41.43% for SPXU. On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, PSQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -18.89% return vs -41.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.49% for PSQ.
PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.11 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer