PSQ vs. XLP
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -19.15%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XLP. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
PSQ vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -14.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of -19.15%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -24.40%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -13.78%
- 10Y*
- -19.15%
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
PSQ vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -14.02% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and XLP is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.49 |
The correlation between PSQ and XLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.49 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSQ vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSQ
XLP
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSQ
XLP
-
Basic Materials
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Communication Services
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSQ
-
XLP
Consumer Defensive
PSQ
-
XLP
Energy
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Healthcare
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Industrials
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Technology
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Utilities
PSQ
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
XLP
PSQ vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.11 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 0.79 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 1.52 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -35.90% | -62.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.86% | -9.69% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -12.39% | -37.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -16.30% | -44.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | -24.51% | -64.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.20% | -4.12% | -94.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -7.06% | -66.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.96% | 5.01% | +7.95% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.53%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 4.53% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 10.14% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 12.90% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 13.34% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 14.75% | +7.59% |
PSQ vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQ vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than XLP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.09% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and XLP have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.60% vs -19.15% for PSQ. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.60% return vs -19.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 2.53% for XLP.
PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.08% for XLP.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer