XLP vs. IYK
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index while IYK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.31%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for IYK. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYK.
Performance
XLP vs. IYK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLP having a 7.13% return and IYK slightly higher at 7.31%. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed IYK with an annualized return of 7.31%, while IYK has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
IYK
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
XLP vs. IYK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 7.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 7.31% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and IYK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XLP and IYK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLP vs. IYK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
IYK
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
IYK
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
IYK
Basic Materials
XLP
-
IYK
Communication Services
XLP
-
IYK
-
Energy
XLP
-
IYK
-
Financial Services
XLP
-
IYK
-
Healthcare
XLP
-
IYK
Industrials
XLP
-
IYK
Real Estate
XLP
-
IYK
-
Technology
XLP
-
IYK
-
Utilities
XLP
-
IYK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. IYK — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
IYK
XLP vs. IYK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 0.81 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. IYK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum IYK drawdown of -42.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and IYK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -42.64% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -10.68% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -12.14% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -15.05% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -33.19% | +8.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -7.50% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -5.07% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 5.20% | -0.12% |
Volatility
XLP vs. IYK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.82%, while iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.09% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | 9.91% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 12.69% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 13.07% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 15.55% | -0.78% |
XLP vs. IYK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYK's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLP vs. IYK - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than IYK's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.35% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XLP and IYK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IYK has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to XLP (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs IYK's -42.64%.
On 10-year performance, IYK leads with 9.22% vs 7.31% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYK has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.67% for IYK.
XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.42% for IYK.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and IYK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer