PortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and XLF is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

XLP vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

420.00%440.00%460.00%480.00%500.00%520.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
466.86%
483.28%
XLP
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLP:

0.77

XLF:

1.18

Sortino Ratio

XLP:

1.16

XLF:

1.68

Omega Ratio

XLP:

1.15

XLF:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

XLP:

1.22

XLF:

1.53

Martin Ratio

XLP:

3.25

XLF:

5.87

Ulcer Index

XLP:

3.13%

XLF:

4.07%

Daily Std Dev

XLP:

13.24%

XLF:

20.22%

Max Drawdown

XLP:

-35.89%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

XLP:

-2.02%

XLF:

-4.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 8.03%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


XLP

YTD

4.20%

1M

5.07%

6M

3.74%

1Y

8.92%

5Y*

9.89%

10Y*

8.03%

XLF

YTD

2.69%

1M

12.16%

6M

0.59%

1Y

21.86%

5Y*

19.57%

10Y*

13.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLP vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLP and XLF have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLP vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLP is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLP is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLP is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLP is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLP is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLP is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLP vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.68
1.09
XLP
XLF

Dividends

XLP vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than XLF's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLP
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.50%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.53%2.40%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.44%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

XLP vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.89%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.02%
-4.91%
XLP
XLF

Volatility

XLP vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) is 5.89%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.89%
9.49%
XLP
XLF