PSQ vs. DXCM
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -18.20%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for DXCM. Their -0.43 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
PSQ vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly lower than DXCM's 25.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed DXCM with an annualized return of -18.20%, while DXCM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- 6M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- -15.69%
- 3Y*
- -15.05%
- 5Y*
- -11.74%
- 10Y*
- -18.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -16.38%
DXCM
- 1D
- 11.95%
- 1M
- 21.19%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- -11.89%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | $381.17M | $359.84M | $403.63M |
| $270.27M | $217.80M | $219.49M |
PSQ vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -9.94% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 25.73% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and DXCM is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.43 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PSQ and DXCM has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.43 to -0.15, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
DXCM
PSQ vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.10 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 0.19 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and DXCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -94.61% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.83% | -33.33% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -60.95% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -66.32% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.66% | -66.32% | -21.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.12% | -48.75% | -49.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.15% | -36.14% | -38.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.73% | 17.53% | -4.80% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 6.96%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 15.95%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 15.95% | -8.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | 29.74% | -13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 42.91% | -23.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 47.22% | -24.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 48.66% | -26.20% |
Dividends
PSQ vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, while DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.26% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and DXCM have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to PSQ (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs DXCM's -94.61%.
DXCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and DXCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer