PSQ vs. DXCM
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -19.15%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for DXCM. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PSQ vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -14.02% return, which is significantly lower than DXCM's 13.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed DXCM with an annualized return of -19.15%, while DXCM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -24.40%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -13.78%
- 10Y*
- -19.15%
DXCM
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 22.29%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- -15.73%
- 5Y*
- -5.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
PSQ vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -14.02% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 13.56% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and DXCM is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.43 |
The correlation between PSQ and DXCM shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (5 years) to -0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
DXCM
PSQ vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.00 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.23 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | -0.40 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and DXCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -94.61% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.86% | -38.75% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -60.95% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -66.32% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | -66.32% | -22.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.20% | -53.71% | -44.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.99% | -36.02% | -37.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.96% | 22.77% | -9.81% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 7.39%, while DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | DXCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 13.27% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 25.48% | -11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 40.74% | -23.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 46.98% | -24.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 48.43% | -26.09% |
Dividends
PSQ vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.09% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and DXCM have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to PSQ (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs DXCM's -94.61%.
DXCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and DXCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer