PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXCM vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXCM vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 13.66%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.


DXCM

1D
11.95%
1M
17.12%
6M
14.25%
YTD
25.73%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
-11.89%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
13.66%
ALL TIME*
16.87%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$381.17M$359.84M$403.63M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

DXCM vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
25.73%-14.66%-37.33%9.58%-15.64%45.23%69.02%82.59%108.75%-3.87%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DXCM and VYM is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXCM vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DXCM
DXCM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DXCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXCM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DXCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXCM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DXCM vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DXCMVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

3.56

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

13.40

-13.21

DXCM vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXCM Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXCM and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DXCM vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXCMVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.61%

-56.98%

-37.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.33%

-6.69%

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.95%

-14.46%

-46.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.32%

-15.84%

-50.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.32%

-35.21%

-31.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.75%

-1.15%

-47.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.14%

-7.14%

-29.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.53%

1.78%

+15.75%

Volatility

DXCM vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 15.95% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXCMVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.95%

2.46%

+13.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.74%

7.42%

+22.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.91%

10.29%

+32.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.22%

13.87%

+33.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.66%

16.29%

+32.37%

Dividends

DXCM vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXCM and VYM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXCM has higher volatility (15.95%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs VYM's -56.98%.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXCM and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer