PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DXCM vs. TNDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


DXCMTNDM
YTD Return3.45%51.18%
1Y Return9.33%19.22%
3Y Return (Ann)11.42%-21.21%
5Y Return (Ann)33.12%-7.87%
10Y Return (Ann)32.70%-12.31%
Sharpe Ratio0.230.16
Daily Std Dev40.10%73.92%
Max Drawdown-94.61%-99.25%
Current Drawdown-21.16%-85.08%

Fundamentals


DXCMTNDM
Market Cap$51.05B$2.28B
EPS$1.54-$3.43
PEG Ratio2.530.00
Revenue (TTM)$3.80B$747.72M
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.88B$412.99M
EBITDA (TTM)$848.50M-$138.75M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between DXCM and TNDM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

DXCM vs. TNDM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than TNDM's 51.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has outperformed TNDM with an annualized return of 32.70%, while TNDM has yielded a comparatively lower -12.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,479.45%
-76.78%
DXCM
TNDM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DexCom, Inc.

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DXCM vs. TNDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXCM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DXCM, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DXCM, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DXCM, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DXCM, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DXCM, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.51
TNDM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TNDM, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TNDM, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TNDM, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TNDM, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TNDM, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.36

DXCM vs. TNDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXCM Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the TNDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of DXCM and TNDM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.23
0.16
DXCM
TNDM

Dividends

DXCM vs. TNDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXCM nor TNDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DXCM vs. TNDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, roughly equal to the maximum TNDM drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and TNDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-21.16%
-85.08%
DXCM
TNDM

Volatility

DXCM vs. TNDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) is 13.19%, while Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that DXCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.19%
24.91%
DXCM
TNDM

Financials

DXCM vs. TNDM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DexCom, Inc. and Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items