PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXCM vs. SF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXCM vs. SF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Stifel Financial Corp. (SF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than SF's -16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has underperformed SF with an annualized return of 15.73%, while SF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.


DXCM

1D
-0.93%
1M
21.20%
YTD
9.64%
6M
12.21%
1Y
-16.15%
3Y*
-15.95%
5Y*
-5.34%
10Y*
15.73%

SF

1D
-0.01%
1M
-8.71%
YTD
-16.11%
6M
-14.54%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
17.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXCM vs. SF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
9.64%-14.66%-37.33%9.58%-15.64%45.23%69.02%82.59%108.75%-3.87%
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
-16.11%20.07%56.37%21.24%-15.57%40.79%26.32%47.99%-29.86%19.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DXCM and SF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2005

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXCM:

$28.64B

SF:

$7.65B

EPS

DXCM:

$2.31

SF:

$8.03

PE Ratio

DXCM:

31.44

SF:

8.64

PS Ratio

DXCM:

6.07

SF:

1.17

PB Ratio

DXCM:

9.69

SF:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXCM:

$4.82B

SF:

$6.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXCM:

$2.96B

SF:

$5.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

DXCM:

$1.37B

SF:

$1.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXCM vs. SF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXCM
DXCM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DXCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXCM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DXCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXCM Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SF
SF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXCM vs. SF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and Stifel Financial Corp. (SF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXCMSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.49

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.31

0.81

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.10

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

0.59

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.72

1.40

-2.11

DXCM vs. SF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXCM Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the SF Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXCM and SF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXCMSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.49

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.36

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.49

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.24

+0.06

Drawdowns

DXCM vs. SF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, which is greater than SF's maximum drawdown of -78.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and SF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXCMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.61%

-78.37%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.75%

-21.20%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.95%

-34.67%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.32%

-36.25%

-30.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.32%

-51.89%

-14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.31%

-21.15%

-34.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-29.18%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.63%

8.97%

+13.66%

Volatility

DXCM vs. SF - Volatility Comparison

DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) at 5.71%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXCMSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.22%

5.71%

+7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.61%

19.96%

+4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.26%

25.72%

+14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.91%

31.21%

+15.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.43%

35.19%

+13.24%

Dividends

DXCM vs. SF - Dividend Comparison

DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SF
Stifel Financial Corp.
1.86%1.47%1.58%2.08%2.06%0.85%0.90%0.99%1.16%0.34%

Financials

DXCM vs. SF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DexCom, Inc. and Stifel Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.19B
1.67B
(DXCM) Total Revenue
(SF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DXCM vs. SF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DexCom, Inc. and Stifel Financial Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
63.0%
82.8%
Portfolio components
DXCM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 750.30M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

SF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.8%.

DXCM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.30M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

SF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 542.38M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.6%.

DXCM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 199.50M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

SF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stifel Financial Corp. reported a net income of 251.42M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXCM and SF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXCM has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to SF (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs SF's -78.37%.

SF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXCM and SF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer