PRU vs. KMB
PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. PRU operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PRU returned 9.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRU vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRU achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PRU has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 9.04%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.
PRU
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -4.69%
- 1Y
- 11.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
PRU vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -1.25% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRU and KMB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001 | 0.29 |
The correlation between PRU and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRU:
$37.91B
KMB:
$34.08B
PRU:
$9.85
KMB:
$5.93
PRU:
11.01
KMB:
17.26
PRU:
0.46
KMB:
2.98
PRU:
0.80
KMB:
2.06
PRU:
$47.43B
KMB:
$16.54B
PRU:
$14.72B
KMB:
$5.93B
PRU:
$4.02B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRU vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
PRU
KMB
PRU vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRU | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.87 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | -0.67 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | -1.03 | +1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRU vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRU drawdown since its inception was -88.53%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRU and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRU | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.53% | -36.97% | -51.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.46% | -29.60% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -34.06% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | -34.06% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.89% | -34.06% | -31.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.47% | -26.52% | +17.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -8.85% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.90% | 19.43% | -9.53% |
Volatility
PRU vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) is 6.05%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that PRU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRU | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 8.42% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.48% | 16.67% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.66% | 25.77% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 20.19% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.83% | 21.07% | +10.76% |
Dividends
PRU vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.07% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
Financials
PRU vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential Financial, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PRU and KMB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to PRU (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRU dropped -88.53% vs KMB's -36.97%.
PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRU and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer