PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRDO vs. LINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRDO vs. LINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRDO achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 107.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PRDO has underperformed LINC with an annualized return of 19.90%, while LINC has yielded a comparatively higher 41.28% annualized return.


PRDO

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
13.86%
6M
17.63%
1Y
-0.12%
3Y*
41.42%
5Y*
23.11%
10Y*
19.90%

LINC

1D
2.06%
1M
21.94%
YTD
107.33%
6M
126.77%
1Y
115.73%
3Y*
93.23%
5Y*
45.95%
10Y*
41.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRDO vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
13.86%12.94%54.04%27.99%18.20%-6.89%-31.32%61.03%-5.46%19.72%
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
107.33%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%-15.62%58.42%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PRDO and LINC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.29

Over the past year, PRDO and LINC have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRDO:

$2.10B

LINC:

$1.57B

EPS

PRDO:

$2.61

LINC:

$0.72

PE Ratio

PRDO:

12.70

LINC:

69.93

PEG Ratio

PRDO:

0.87

LINC:

2.46

PS Ratio

PRDO:

2.53

LINC:

2.88

PB Ratio

PRDO:

2.10

LINC:

7.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRDO:

$854.84M

LINC:

$544.69M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRDO:

$442.47M

LINC:

$242.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

PRDO:

$269.29M

LINC:

$49.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRDO vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRDO
PRDO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRDO vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRDOLINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.41

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

4.26

-4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

11.71

-11.72

PRDO vs. LINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRDO Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the LINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRDO and LINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRDOLINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

2.50

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.05

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.09

+0.10

Drawdowns

PRDO vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRDO drawdown since its inception was -97.10%, roughly equal to the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDO and LINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRDOLINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.10%

-99.11%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.22%

-27.35%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.22%

-27.35%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.42%

-41.96%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.27%

-57.51%

-6.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.13%

-3.75%

-46.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.38%

-59.12%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.53%

9.93%

+2.60%

Volatility

PRDO vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is 8.40%, while Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that PRDO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRDOLINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

17.66%

-9.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.88%

31.21%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.51%

46.61%

-16.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.13%

43.96%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.13%

57.06%

-18.93%

Dividends

PRDO vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison

PRDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
1.81%1.91%1.81%1.25%

Financials

PRDO vs. LINC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perdoceo Education Corporation and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
221.74M
143.96M
(PRDO) Total Revenue
(LINC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRDO vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Perdoceo Education Corporation and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
PRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 221.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported an operating income of 63.12M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

PRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a net income of 53.95M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRDO and LINC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINC has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to PRDO (8.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRDO dropped -97.10% vs LINC's -99.11%.

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRDO and LINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer