POBAX vs. BLNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

POBAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, POBAX returned 3.85%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for BLNDX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. POBAX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.

Performance

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 17.17% return.

POBAX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: 5.88%

BLNDX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 17.17%
• 6M: 18.61%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 9.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	5.55%	11.53%	8.17%	11.33%	-16.92%	7.64%	12.39%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	17.17%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between POBAX and BLNDX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.58

The correlation between POBAX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

POBAX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POBAX

POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 62
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 75
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POBAX	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.44	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.19	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	6.52	-3.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.79	20.94	-8.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POBAX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POBAX	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.44	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.83	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.06	-0.47

Drawdowns

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and BLNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	POBAX	BLNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.15%	-17.69%	-11.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.15%	-4.75%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.39%	-17.69%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	-17.69%	-4.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.14%	+1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-3.19%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	1.50%	-0.36%

Volatility

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) is 2.03%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that POBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POBAX	BLNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.03%	3.02%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	9.51%	-4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.25%	12.72%	-6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	11.66%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.88%	11.75%	-1.87%

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POBAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

POBAX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.63%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	2.89%	3.06%	3.68%	2.67%	13.64%	6.84%	2.56%	2.31%	20.06%	3.22%	4.32%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POBAX and BLNDX in my portfolio?

POBAX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, POBAX or BLNDX?

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to POBAX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POBAX dropped -29.15% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.