BLNDX vs. COM
BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both funds - BLNDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Ultimus Fund, while COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. Over the past 5 years, BLNDX returned 9.26%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for COM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLNDX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
BLNDX vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BLNDX having a 12.91% return and COM slightly lower at 12.48%.
BLNDX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
COM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
BLNDX vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 12.91% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% | 0.00% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 12.48% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.09% | 9.17% | 28.00% | 6.63% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLNDX and COM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.40 |
The correlation between BLNDX and COM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLNDX vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
BLNDX
COM
BLNDX vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLNDX | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | 2.76 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.90 | 9.09 | +9.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLNDX vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLNDX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNDX and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLNDX | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -15.95% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.19% | -6.81% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.69% | -8.50% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.69% | -14.02% | -3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -6.61% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -6.28% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 2.10% | -0.49% |
Volatility
BLNDX vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 2.13%. This indicates that BLNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLNDX | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 2.13% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 8.54% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 10.54% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 9.53% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 9.76% | +2.01% |
BLNDX vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLNDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLNDX vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
BLNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than COM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.65% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.51% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLNDX and COM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNDX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to COM (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLNDX dropped -17.69% vs COM's -15.95%.
BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLNDX and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer