POBAX vs. PLFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX).
POBAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003. PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011.
Performance
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | -2.60% | 11.53% | 8.17% | 11.33% | -16.92% | 7.64% | 12.39% | 15.64% | -5.83% | 10.46% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than PLFRX's -1.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with POBAX having a 5.22% annualized return and PLFRX not far behind at 5.04%.
POBAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 8.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POBAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
POBAX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
POBAX
PLFRX
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POBAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.96 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 3.42 | -1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.61 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.90 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 9.49 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POBAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.96 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 2.05 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 1.35 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.43 | -0.87 |
Correlation
The correlation between POBAX and PLFRX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison
POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PLFRX's 6.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 3.14% | 3.06% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 13.64% | 6.84% | 2.56% | 2.31% | 20.06% | 3.22% | 4.32% | 5.46% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and PLFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POBAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.15% | -18.75% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -1.82% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -6.44% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.33% | -18.75% | -3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -1.55% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -0.73% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.56% | +0.81% |
Volatility
POBAX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.76%. This indicates that POBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POBAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 0.76% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.62% | 1.79% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 2.76% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 2.74% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 3.75% | +6.10% |