BLNDX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both funds - BLNDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Ultimus Fund, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, BLNDX returned 9.26%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for DBMF. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLNDX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLNDX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.77% return.

BLNDX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 27.61%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	12.91%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%	0.00%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.77%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BLNDX and DBMF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019	0.52

The correlation between BLNDX and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BLNDX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 81
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLNDX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.24	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.94	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.89	4.55	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.90	16.25	+2.65

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLNDX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLNDX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNDX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLNDX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.69%	-20.39%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.19%	-6.10%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.69%	-15.60%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.69%	-20.39%	+2.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-1.46%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-6.55%	+3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.70%	-0.09%

Volatility

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.85%. This indicates that BLNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLNDX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	2.85%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	10.05%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	12.42%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.71%	12.52%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.77%	12.40%	-0.63%

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLNDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLNDX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

BLNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than DBMF's 5.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.65%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.17%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLNDX and DBMF in my portfolio?

BLNDX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLNDX or DBMF?

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to DBMF (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLNDX dropped -17.69% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.