POBAX vs. PODAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX).
POBAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003. PODAX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Dec 30, 2003.
Performance
POBAX vs. PODAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POBAX vs. PODAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | -2.60% | 11.53% | 8.17% | 11.33% | -16.92% | 7.64% | 12.39% | 15.64% | -5.83% | 10.46% |
PODAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth | -3.98% | 14.76% | 13.49% | 15.95% | -19.68% | 15.37% | 14.99% | 23.96% | -8.79% | 16.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than PODAX's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, POBAX has underperformed PODAX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while PODAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.18% annualized return.
POBAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 8.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
PODAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POBAX vs. PODAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POBAX and PODAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
POBAX vs. PODAX — Risk / Return Rank
POBAX
PODAX
POBAX vs. PODAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POBAX | PODAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.90 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.35 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 5.29 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POBAX | PODAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.90 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.40 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between POBAX and PODAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
POBAX vs. PODAX - Dividend Comparison
POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than PODAX's 10.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative | 3.14% | 3.06% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 13.64% | 6.84% | 2.56% | 2.31% | 20.06% | 3.22% | 4.32% | 5.46% |
PODAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth | 10.07% | 9.67% | 2.68% | 1.34% | 26.52% | 10.54% | 2.64% | 6.88% | 25.73% | 4.01% | 6.37% | 8.05% |
Drawdowns
POBAX vs. PODAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, smaller than the maximum PODAX drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and PODAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POBAX | PODAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.15% | -50.14% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -10.33% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.33% | -26.99% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.33% | -32.11% | +9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -7.53% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -6.61% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 2.13% | -0.76% |
Volatility
POBAX vs. PODAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) is 2.74%, while Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that POBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PODAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POBAX | PODAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 4.05% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.62% | 7.64% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 14.30% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 19.85% | -8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 17.46% | -7.61% |