PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POBAX vs. PODAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POBAX vs. PODAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than PODAX's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, POBAX has underperformed PODAX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while PODAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.16% annualized return.


POBAX

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.34%
6M
3.71%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
5.61%
ALL TIME*
5.16%

PODAX

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.14%
6M
7.17%
YTD
9.89%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.16%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

POBAX vs. PODAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
5.19%11.53%8.17%11.33%-16.92%7.64%12.39%15.64%-5.83%10.46%
PODAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth
9.89%14.76%13.49%15.95%-19.68%15.37%14.99%23.96%-8.79%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between POBAX and PODAX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2004

0.96

The correlation between POBAX and PODAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POBAX vs. PODAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

POBAX
POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PODAX
PODAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PODAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PODAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PODAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PODAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PODAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

POBAX vs. PODAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


POBAXPODAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.20

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

9.56

-0.99

POBAX vs. PODAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the PODAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POBAX and PODAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POBAX vs. PODAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, smaller than the maximum PODAX drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and PODAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POBAXPODAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.15%

-50.14%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-7.53%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.39%

-15.02%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-26.99%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

-32.11%

+9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.83%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-6.53%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.73%

-0.55%

Volatility

POBAX vs. PODAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) is 1.94%, while Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth (PODAX) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that POBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PODAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POBAXPODAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

2.98%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

9.02%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

11.10%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.46%

19.98%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.88%

17.47%

-7.59%

POBAX vs. PODAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POBAX and PODAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

POBAX vs. PODAX - Dividend Comparison

POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than PODAX's 8.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POBAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative
2.90%3.06%3.68%2.67%13.64%6.84%2.56%2.31%20.06%3.22%4.32%5.46%
PODAX
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth
8.80%9.67%2.68%1.34%26.52%10.54%2.64%6.88%25.73%4.01%6.37%8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, POBAX and PODAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PODAX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to POBAX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POBAX dropped -29.15% vs PODAX's -50.14%.

PODAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POBAX and PODAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer