POBAX vs. POEAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

POBAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative) and POEAX (Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past 10 years, POBAX returned 5.88%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for POEAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

POBAX vs. POEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POBAX achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly lower than POEAX's 11.26% return. Over the past 10 years, POBAX has underperformed POEAX with an annualized return of 5.88%, while POEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.

POBAX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 13.56%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 5.88%

POEAX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 10.58%
• 1Y: 25.28%
• 3Y*: 16.75%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POBAX vs. POEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	5.37%	11.53%	8.17%	11.33%	-16.92%	7.64%	12.39%	15.64%	-5.83%	10.46%
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth	11.26%	16.66%	15.13%	18.53%	-21.24%	18.82%	16.09%	26.91%	-9.28%	19.17%

Correlation

The correlation between POBAX and POEAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2004	0.94

The correlation between POBAX and POEAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

POBAX vs. POEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POBAX

POBAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
POBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
POBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
POBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
POBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
POBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

POEAX

POEAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
POEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
POEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
POEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
POEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
POEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POBAX vs. POEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) and Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	POBAX	POEAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.99	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.76	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.36	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.90	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	12.72	-1.07

POBAX vs. POEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the POEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POBAX and POEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

POBAX vs. POEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, smaller than the maximum POEAX drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POBAX and POEAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	POBAX	POEAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.15%	-57.49%	+28.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.15%	-8.57%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.39%	-17.49%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.33%	-29.40%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.33%	-35.88%	+13.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.43%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-8.80%	+5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	1.95%	-0.79%

Volatility

POBAX vs. POEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative (POBAX) is 2.64%, while Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth (POEAX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that POBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POBAX	POEAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	4.81%	-2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.52%	9.96%	-4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.63%	12.49%	-5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.44%	25.15%	-13.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.90%	21.58%	-11.68%

POBAX vs. POEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both POBAX and POEAX have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

POBAX vs. POEAX - Dividend Comparison

POBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than POEAX's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POBAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative	2.90%	3.06%	3.68%	2.67%	13.64%	6.84%	2.56%	2.31%	20.06%	3.22%	4.32%	5.46%
POEAX Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth	6.94%	7.73%	2.12%	1.67%	36.10%	10.62%	3.32%	7.91%	24.81%	4.03%	7.09%	3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both POBAX and POEAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, POBAX and POEAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, POBAX or POEAX?

POEAX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to POBAX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POBAX dropped -29.15% vs POEAX's -57.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

POBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.