PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLNDX vs. QDSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLNDX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than QDSIX's 5.50% return.


BLNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
12.91%
6M
12.08%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*

QDSIX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.41%
YTD
5.50%
6M
5.72%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
12.91%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%12.92%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
5.50%16.36%9.71%8.88%14.69%10.64%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BLNDX and QDSIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.39

The correlation between BLNDX and QDSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLNDX vs. QDSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSIX
QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLNDXQDSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.99

7.21

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.90

19.76

-0.86

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the QDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLNDX and QDSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLNDX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNDX and QDSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLNDXQDSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-7.06%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-1.96%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

-6.90%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

-7.06%

-10.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-0.94%

-3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-1.44%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

0.71%

+0.93%

Volatility

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison

Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) at 1.80%. This indicates that BLNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLNDXQDSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.80%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

3.66%

+6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

5.14%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.70%

7.62%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.77%

7.31%

+4.46%

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLNDX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLNDX vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison

BLNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than QDSIX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.65%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
2.12%2.23%0.00%11.35%8.22%6.07%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLNDX and QDSIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to QDSIX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLNDX dropped -17.69% vs QDSIX's -7.06%.

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLNDX and QDSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer