PMAR vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. PMAR is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, PMAR returned 14.20% vs 20.74% for QFLR. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

PMAR vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's 3.27% return.

PMAR

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAR vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	5.76%	11.82%	11.89%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	3.27%	17.27%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAR and QFLR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.80

The correlation between PMAR and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMAR vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAR

PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 54
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAR vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMAR	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.63	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	2.18	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.31	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	2.74	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.17	10.85	+9.33

PMAR vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAR and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PMAR vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAR	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.18%	-13.97%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.11%	-7.61%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-3.86%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-2.50%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	1.92%	-1.21%

Volatility

PMAR vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 1.69%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMAR	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	6.59%	-4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	9.90%	-5.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.35%	12.77%	-7.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.20%	13.13%	-4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.71%	13.13%	-2.42%

PMAR vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMAR vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAR nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMAR and QFLR in my portfolio?

PMAR and QFLR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMAR or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to PMAR (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, PMAR or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 20.74% vs 14.20% for PMAR. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMAR or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 14.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMAR or QFLR?

PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMAR or QFLR?

PMAR and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMAR and QFLR?

PMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAR and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.