PMAR vs. ALLW
PMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March) and ALLW (SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index, while ALLW is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by State Street. PMAR is passively managed, while ALLW is actively managed. Over the past year, PMAR returned 15.93% vs 24.48% for ALLW. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ALLW.
Performance
PMAR vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 10.04% return.
PMAR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
ALLW
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 24.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAR vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 6.36% | 11.49% |
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 10.04% | 15.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAR and ALLW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.49 |
PMAR vs. ALLW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PMAR
ALLW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PMAR
ALLW
Financial Services
PMAR
ALLW
Communication Services
PMAR
ALLW
Consumer Cyclical
PMAR
ALLW
Healthcare
PMAR
ALLW
Industrials
PMAR
ALLW
Consumer Defensive
PMAR
ALLW
Energy
PMAR
ALLW
Utilities
PMAR
ALLW
Real Estate
PMAR
ALLW
Basic Materials
PMAR
ALLW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAR vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank
PMAR
ALLW
PMAR vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMAR | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 2.34 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.52 | 3.15 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.43 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.47 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.14 | 14.77 | +8.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAR | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 2.34 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.68 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
PMAR vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and ALLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAR | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -8.78% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -7.23% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.20% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 1.70% | -1.01% |
Volatility
PMAR vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 0.83%, while SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAR | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 3.36% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | 8.69% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 10.50% | -5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 12.54% | -4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.73% | 12.54% | -1.81% |
PMAR vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAR vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison
PMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 4.25% | 4.67% |
PMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAR and ALLW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALLW has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to PMAR (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAR dropped -17.18% vs ALLW's -8.78%.
On 1-year performance, ALLW leads with 24.48% vs 15.93% for PMAR. On fees, PMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ALLW has performed better with a 24.48% return vs 15.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ALLW.
ALLW has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 0.00% for PMAR.
PMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ALLW is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PMAR and 0.85% for ALLW.
PMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAR and ALLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer