PMAR vs. IVW
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW).
PMAR and IVW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PMAR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect March Series Index. It was launched on Mar 2, 2020. IVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both PMAR and IVW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PMAR or IVW.
Correlation
The correlation between PMAR and IVW is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PMAR vs. IVW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PMAR:
2.31
IVW:
2.34
PMAR:
3.18
IVW:
3.00
PMAR:
1.50
IVW:
1.42
PMAR:
3.06
IVW:
3.21
PMAR:
16.15
IVW:
12.60
PMAR:
0.83%
IVW:
3.24%
PMAR:
5.78%
IVW:
17.46%
PMAR:
-17.18%
IVW:
-57.33%
PMAR:
-0.07%
IVW:
-0.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 40.73% return.
PMAR
13.17%
0.80%
6.27%
13.39%
N/A
N/A
IVW
40.73%
5.73%
14.02%
40.82%
17.66%
15.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PMAR vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PMAR vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PMAR vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison
PMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
PMAR vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and IVW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PMAR vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is 1.46%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that PMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.