PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAR vs. PAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PMAR vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PMAR vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March
-0.72%11.82%12.83%15.95%-2.65%10.96%6.64%
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
1.74%6.58%12.28%16.45%-4.29%7.51%5.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAR achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 1.74% return.


PMAR

1D
1.78%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
1.62%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

PAPR

1D
0.45%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.74%
6M
3.75%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
10.62%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PMAR vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMAR and PAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

PMAR vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAR
PMAR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPR
PAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAR vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMARPAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.36

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

2.06

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.70

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.43

11.88

-2.46

PMAR vs. PAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the PAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAR and PAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMARPAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.36

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.92

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between PMAR and PAPR is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PMAR vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAR nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.07%

Drawdowns

PMAR vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAR drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, which is greater than PAPR's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAR and PAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PMARPAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-15.31%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-7.26%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

-11.87%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

0.00%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-1.61%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.04%

+0.24%

Volatility

PMAR vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 1.01%. This indicates that PMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PMARPAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

1.01%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

2.04%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

8.62%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

8.23%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.84%

9.53%

+1.31%