PLDR vs. LCTU
PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) and LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLDR is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PLDR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LCTU.
Performance
PLDR vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLDR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCTU
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
PLDR vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 1.69% | 12.03% | 23.47% | 27.47% | -22.52% | 11.54% |
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 9.26% | 16.96% | 24.00% | 25.38% | -20.02% | 14.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLDR and LCTU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PLDR and LCTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
PLDR vs. LCTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLDR
LCTU
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PLDR
LCTU
Communication Services
PLDR
LCTU
Consumer Cyclical
PLDR
LCTU
Financial Services
PLDR
LCTU
Industrials
PLDR
LCTU
Healthcare
PLDR
LCTU
Consumer Defensive
PLDR
LCTU
Utilities
PLDR
LCTU
Energy
PLDR
LCTU
Basic Materials
PLDR
LCTU
Real Estate
PLDR
LCTU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLDR vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank
PLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LCTU
PLDR vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLDR | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLDR vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLDR | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.76% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.22% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
PLDR vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLDR | LCTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.23% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.97% | — |
PLDR vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLDR vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison
PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 2.20% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLDR and LCTU have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.
LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.
PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while LCTU is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.15% for LCTU.
Find the right allocation for PLDR and LCTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer