PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. LCTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDR vs. LCTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLDR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LCTU

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.76%
6M
7.38%
YTD
9.26%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. LCTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
1.69%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.54%
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
9.26%16.96%24.00%25.38%-20.02%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and LCTU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.95

The correlation between PLDR and LCTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PLDR vs. LCTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLDR
LCTU

Technology

38.3%
36.4%

Communication Services

11.1%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.8%

Financial Services

9.9%
11.9%

Industrials

8.4%
8.6%

Healthcare

7.5%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.4%

Utilities

3.4%
2.8%

Energy

3.1%
2.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.2%

Technology

PLDR
38.3%
LCTU
36.4%

Communication Services

PLDR
11.1%
LCTU
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PLDR
10.1%
LCTU
9.8%

Financial Services

PLDR
9.9%
LCTU
11.9%

Industrials

PLDR
8.4%
LCTU
8.6%

Healthcare

PLDR
7.5%
LCTU
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

PLDR
5.3%
LCTU
4.4%

Utilities

PLDR
3.4%
LCTU
2.8%

Energy

PLDR
3.1%
LCTU
2.9%

Basic Materials

PLDR
2.3%
LCTU
1.8%

Real Estate

PLDR
0.6%
LCTU
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. LCTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LCTU
LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. LCTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDRLCTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

PLDR vs. LCTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. LCTU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRLCTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

Volatility

PLDR vs. LCTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDRLCTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

PLDR vs. LCTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTU's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDR vs. LCTU - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
0.96%1.02%1.27%1.46%1.63%2.20%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.37%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDR and LCTU have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while LCTU is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.15% for LCTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDR and LCTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer