PortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. FFLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and FFLC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

PLDR vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
22.85%
52.11%
PLDR
FFLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLDR:

0.20

FFLC:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

PLDR:

0.37

FFLC:

0.63

Omega Ratio

PLDR:

1.05

FFLC:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

PLDR:

0.16

FFLC:

0.36

Martin Ratio

PLDR:

0.58

FFLC:

1.40

Ulcer Index

PLDR:

6.20%

FFLC:

5.02%

Daily Std Dev

PLDR:

18.06%

FFLC:

19.85%

Max Drawdown

PLDR:

-29.57%

FFLC:

-19.72%

Current Drawdown

PLDR:

-14.43%

FFLC:

-11.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLDR achieves a -9.70% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's -7.16% return.


PLDR

YTD

-9.70%

1M

-5.09%

6M

-10.90%

1Y

2.44%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFLC

YTD

-7.16%

1M

-5.97%

6M

-7.75%

1Y

5.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLDR vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for PLDR: current value is 0.59%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
PLDR: 0.59%
Expense ratio chart for FFLC: current value is 0.38%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FFLC: 0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLDR vs. FFLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLDR is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLDR is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLDR is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLDR is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLDR is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLDR is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLC is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLDR vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLDR, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
PLDR: 0.20
FFLC: 0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLDR, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PLDR: 0.37
FFLC: 0.63
The chart of Omega ratio for PLDR, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
PLDR: 1.05
FFLC: 1.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLDR, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
PLDR: 0.16
FFLC: 0.36
The chart of Martin ratio for PLDR, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
PLDR: 0.58
FFLC: 1.40

The current PLDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLDR and FFLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.20
0.35
PLDR
FFLC

Dividends

PLDR vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FFLC's 1.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.43%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.02%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLDR drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLDR and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-14.43%
-11.92%
PLDR
FFLC

Volatility

PLDR vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) is 11.54%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 14.06%. This indicates that PLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.54%
14.06%
PLDR
FFLC