PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. FFLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDR vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLDR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFLC

1D
0.63%
1M
1.97%
6M
9.08%
YTD
11.52%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
21.58%
5Y*
16.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
1.69%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.54%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
11.52%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and FFLC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.86

The correlation between PLDR and FFLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PLDR vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLDR
FFLC

Technology

38.3%
31.3%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.7%

Financial Services

9.9%
13.5%

Industrials

8.4%
10.7%

Healthcare

7.5%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.7%

Utilities

3.4%
2.7%

Energy

3.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.1%

Technology

PLDR
38.3%
FFLC
31.3%

Communication Services

PLDR
11.1%
FFLC
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PLDR
10.1%
FFLC
9.7%

Financial Services

PLDR
9.9%
FFLC
13.5%

Industrials

PLDR
8.4%
FFLC
10.7%

Healthcare

PLDR
7.5%
FFLC
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

PLDR
5.3%
FFLC
4.7%

Utilities

PLDR
3.4%
FFLC
2.7%

Energy

PLDR
3.1%
FFLC
4.0%

Basic Materials

PLDR
2.3%
FFLC
2.0%

Real Estate

PLDR
0.6%
FFLC
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDRFFLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

PLDR vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRFFLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

PLDR vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDRFFLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

PLDR vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDR vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.98%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.37%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDR and FFLC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.38% for FFLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDR and FFLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer