PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLDR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
-1.48%
1M
-0.34%
6M
12.52%
YTD
16.39%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
1.69%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.54%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.39%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%15.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and SPHQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.88

The correlation between PLDR and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLDR
SPHQ

Technology

38.3%
40.1%

Communication Services

11.1%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.6%

Financial Services

9.9%
16.1%

Industrials

8.4%
12.6%

Healthcare

7.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
7.9%

Utilities

3.4%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Technology

PLDR
38.3%
SPHQ
40.1%

Communication Services

PLDR
11.1%
SPHQ
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PLDR
10.1%
SPHQ
5.6%

Financial Services

PLDR
9.9%
SPHQ
16.1%

Industrials

PLDR
8.4%
SPHQ
12.6%

Healthcare

PLDR
7.5%
SPHQ
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

PLDR
5.3%
SPHQ
7.9%

Utilities

PLDR
3.4%
SPHQ
4.5%

Energy

PLDR
3.1%
SPHQ
1.0%

Basic Materials

PLDR
2.3%
SPHQ
3.5%

Real Estate

PLDR
0.6%
SPHQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDRSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDRSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDR vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.37%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.07%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDR and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.37% for PLDR.

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while SPHQ is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.15% for SPHQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDR and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer