LCTU vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
LCTU and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCTU is an actively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management. It was launched on Apr 6, 2021. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCTU or IVV.
Correlation
The correlation between LCTU and IVV is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCTU vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LCTU:
-0.15
IVV:
-0.09
LCTU:
-0.08
IVV:
-0.01
LCTU:
0.99
IVV:
1.00
LCTU:
-0.13
IVV:
-0.08
LCTU:
-0.66
IVV:
-0.44
LCTU:
3.55%
IVV:
3.31%
LCTU:
16.10%
IVV:
15.85%
LCTU:
-25.93%
IVV:
-55.25%
LCTU:
-18.15%
IVV:
-17.32%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCTU having a -14.18% return and IVV slightly higher at -13.50%.
LCTU
-14.18%
-13.52%
-12.01%
-1.11%
N/A
N/A
IVV
-13.50%
-13.12%
-11.24%
-0.21%
17.09%
11.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCTU vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCTU vs. IVV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LCTU
IVV
LCTU vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCTU vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than IVV's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 1.46% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.62% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.53% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
LCTU vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCTU vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.