PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTU vs. PARWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTU vs. PARWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than PARWX's 16.18% return.


LCTU

1D
0.50%
1M
0.00%
6M
7.81%
YTD
8.70%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.41%

PARWX

1D
2.05%
1M
-0.28%
6M
11.59%
YTD
16.18%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
14.90%
ALL TIME*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.76M$15.41M$7.11M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LCTU vs. PARWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
8.70%16.96%24.00%25.38%-20.02%17.74%
PARWX
Parnassus Endeavor Fund
16.18%19.07%12.03%13.67%-13.71%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and PARWX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.90

The correlation between LCTU and PARWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTU vs. PARWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCTU
LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PARWX
PARWX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PARWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PARWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PARWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PARWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PARWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCTU vs. PARWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCTUPARWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.10

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

14.45

-6.50

LCTU vs. PARWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the PARWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and PARWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. PARWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum PARWX drawdown of -47.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and PARWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTUPARWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-47.76%

+21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-8.92%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-18.02%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-32.27%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.72%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-6.84%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.92%

+0.30%

Volatility

LCTU vs. PARWX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTUPARWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.41%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

9.64%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

12.39%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

18.74%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

20.95%

-4.03%

LCTU vs. PARWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PARWX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTU vs. PARWX - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than PARWX's 10.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
0.96%1.02%1.27%1.46%1.63%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PARWX
Parnassus Endeavor Fund
10.45%12.14%8.25%1.76%2.97%16.75%0.70%0.79%12.34%6.32%3.27%10.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTU and PARWX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PARWX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to LCTU (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs PARWX's -47.76%.

PARWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTU and PARWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer