PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LCTU vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTU vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.66%
10.78%
LCTU
QQQ

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 25.86% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 24.04% return.


LCTU

YTD

25.86%

1M

3.49%

6M

13.66%

1Y

32.97%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QQQ

YTD

24.04%

1M

3.57%

6M

10.78%

1Y

30.56%

5Y (annualized)

20.99%

10Y (annualized)

18.03%

Key characteristics


LCTUQQQ
Sharpe Ratio2.681.76
Sortino Ratio3.582.35
Omega Ratio1.491.32
Calmar Ratio3.772.25
Martin Ratio16.908.18
Ulcer Index1.95%3.74%
Daily Std Dev12.30%17.36%
Max Drawdown-25.92%-82.98%
Current Drawdown-0.34%-1.62%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTU vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


QQQ
Invesco QQQ
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for LCTU: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between LCTU and QQQ is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCTU vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCTU, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.681.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCTU, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.582.35
The chart of Omega ratio for LCTU, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.491.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCTU, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.772.25
The chart of Martin ratio for LCTU, currently valued at 16.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.908.18
LCTU
QQQ

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.68
1.76
LCTU
QQQ

Dividends

LCTU vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than QQQ's 0.60% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.24%1.46%1.62%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.60%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%1.02%

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.92%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.34%
-1.62%
LCTU
QQQ

Volatility

LCTU vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is 4.05%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that LCTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.05%
5.36%
LCTU
QQQ