LCTU vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. LCTU is actively managed, while VONG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTU returned 12.73%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

LCTU vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 8.61% return.

LCTU

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 9.85%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 21.47%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: —

VONG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 6.89%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTU vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	9.85%	16.96%	24.00%	25.38%	-20.02%	17.49%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	8.61%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and VONG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021	0.94

The correlation between LCTU and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCTU vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCTU	VONG
Technology	34.6%	51.4%
Financial Services	12.1%	5.3%
Communication Services	10.3%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	13.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.1%
Industrials	8.7%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	2.7%
Energy	3.5%	0.4%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.4%
Utilities	2.5%	0.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	0.3%

Return for Risk

LCTU vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 65
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 46
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCTU	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.85	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.50	+0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.32	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.79	+1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	6.02	+7.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCTU vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCTU	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.85	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.75	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.90	-0.14

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTU	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.93%	-32.72%	+6.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-16.23%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.83%	-23.27%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	-32.72%	+6.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.35%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-4.88%	-1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	4.83%	-2.73%

Volatility

LCTU vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is 2.98%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that LCTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTU	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	3.23%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	11.53%	-2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	15.32%	-3.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	21.33%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.02%	20.87%	-3.85%

LCTU vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCTU vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than VONG's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	0.92%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.42%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTU and VONG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, LCTU and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LCTU or VONG?

VONG has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to LCTU (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, LCTU or VONG?

On 5-year performance, VONG leads with 15.98% vs 12.73% for LCTU. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, LCTU has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTU or VONG?

Over the 5-year period, VONG has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTU or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LCTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTU or VONG?

LCTU has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.42% for VONG.

What is the main difference between LCTU and VONG?

LCTU is categorized as ESG, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.