PLDR vs. GARP
PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLDR is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. PLDR is actively managed, while GARP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PLDR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
PLDR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLDR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PLDR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 1.69% | 12.03% | 23.47% | 27.47% | -22.52% | 11.54% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 18.49% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 19.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLDR and GARP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PLDR and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PLDR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLDR
GARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PLDR
GARP
Communication Services
PLDR
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
PLDR
GARP
Financial Services
PLDR
GARP
Industrials
PLDR
GARP
Healthcare
PLDR
GARP
Consumer Defensive
PLDR
GARP
-
Utilities
PLDR
GARP
Energy
PLDR
GARP
Basic Materials
PLDR
GARP
Real Estate
PLDR
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLDR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
PLDR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GARP
PLDR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLDR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLDR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLDR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.03% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.29% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
PLDR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLDR | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.55% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.29% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.95% | — |
PLDR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLDR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLDR and GARP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.
PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.15% for GARP.
Find the right allocation for PLDR and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer