PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLDR vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLDR vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLDR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M

PLDR vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
1.69%12.03%23.47%27.47%-22.52%11.54%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.89%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PLDR and GARP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.91

The correlation between PLDR and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PLDR vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PLDR
GARP

Technology

38.3%
54.7%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.1%

Financial Services

9.9%
7.9%

Industrials

8.4%
6.4%

Healthcare

7.5%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Utilities

3.4%
1.3%

Energy

3.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.4%

Technology

PLDR
38.3%
GARP
54.7%

Communication Services

PLDR
11.1%
GARP
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PLDR
10.1%
GARP
9.1%

Financial Services

PLDR
9.9%
GARP
7.9%

Industrials

PLDR
8.4%
GARP
6.4%

Healthcare

PLDR
7.5%
GARP
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

PLDR
5.3%
GARP

-

Utilities

PLDR
3.4%
GARP
1.3%

Energy

PLDR
3.1%
GARP
3.0%

Basic Materials

PLDR
2.3%
GARP
1.1%

Real Estate

PLDR
0.6%
GARP
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLDR vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLDR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLDR vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLDRGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

PLDR vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLDR vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDRGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

Volatility

PLDR vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDRGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

PLDR vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLDR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLDR vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

PLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
0.37%0.37%0.38%0.56%0.63%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLDR and GARP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PLDR.

PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

PLDR is categorized as Sustainable, while GARP is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PLDR and 0.15% for GARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLDR and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer