PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than IMCV's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed IMCV with an annualized return of 13.54%, while IMCV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.


PKW

1D
0.23%
1M
2.07%
YTD
3.81%
6M
2.73%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
13.54%

IMCV

1D
0.58%
1M
1.64%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
3.81%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
11.06%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and IMCV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.89

The correlation between PKW and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKW vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
IMCV

Financial Services

28.4%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
9.1%

Industrials

14.0%
11.8%

Technology

12.3%
10.3%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.7%

Energy

5.4%
11.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
9.0%

Utilities

2.2%
9.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
5.5%

Financial Services

PKW
28.4%
IMCV
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.0%
IMCV
9.1%

Industrials

PKW
14.0%
IMCV
11.8%

Technology

PKW
12.3%
IMCV
10.3%

Healthcare

PKW
10.2%
IMCV
8.7%

Energy

PKW
5.4%
IMCV
11.9%

Communication Services

PKW
4.1%
IMCV
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.2%
IMCV
9.0%

Utilities

PKW
2.2%
IMCV
9.6%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.0%
IMCV
6.4%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
IMCV
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKWIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

3.39

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

12.59

-6.09

PKW vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKW vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-64.74%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-6.90%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-18.63%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-19.87%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-46.33%

+5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.88%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-8.40%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.86%

+0.64%

Volatility

PKW vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 3.11%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.11%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

8.12%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

11.75%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

16.62%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

19.61%

+0.14%

PKW vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than IMCV's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.91%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.81%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and IMCV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKW has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to IMCV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 13.54% vs 10.80% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.81% for PKW.

PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer