PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.85%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


PKW

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
2.82%
6M
4.68%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
12.85%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
2.82%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and VOO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.87

The correlation between PKW and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKW vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
VOO

Financial Services

29.4%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

19.1%
10.2%

Industrials

14.2%
8.3%

Technology

10.8%
35.7%

Healthcare

10.1%
8.5%

Energy

5.6%
3.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.9%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Financial Services

PKW
29.4%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.1%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

PKW
14.2%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

PKW
10.8%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

PKW
10.1%
VOO
8.5%

Energy

PKW
5.6%
VOO
3.5%

Communication Services

PKW
4.0%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.4%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

PKW
2.1%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.1%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKWVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

2.53

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

3.43

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.42

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.24

15.95

-8.70

PKW vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKWVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.53

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.87

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.89

-0.37

Drawdowns

PKW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-33.99%

-20.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-8.90%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-18.69%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-24.52%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-33.99%

-6.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-3.69%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.91%

+0.57%

Volatility

PKW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.74%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

8.88%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

11.78%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.81%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

18.01%

+1.78%

PKW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.90%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and VOO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKW has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 12.85% for PKW. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer