PKB vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PKB returned 16.59%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

PKB vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

PKB

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 14.33%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 34.86%
• 3Y*: 27.82%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 15.78%

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	14.33%	22.47%	20.24%	55.29%	-24.88%	32.96%	24.49%	-1.59%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and FNGS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.50

The correlation between PKB and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKB vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PKB	FNGS
Industrials	47.2%	-
Basic Materials	29.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	20.8%	11.3%
Utilities	3.0%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	10.0%
Communication Services	-	28.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	59.9%

Return for Risk

PKB vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB

PKB Risk / Return Rank: 48
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PKB	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	0.79	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.19	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.15	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	0.75	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	2.12	+5.09

PKB vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PKB vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKB	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.21%	-48.98%	-16.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.41%	-22.93%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	-26.77%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-48.98%	+14.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-9.63%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.75%	-10.85%	-4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	8.05%	-3.19%

Volatility

PKB vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) have volatilities of 8.73% and 8.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKB	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	8.74%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.69%	17.19%	+1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.78%	21.65%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.78%	30.10%	-4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.29%	31.17%	-3.88%

PKB vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PKB vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.23%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.30%	0.37%	0.54%	0.17%	0.31%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PKB and FNGS in my portfolio?

PKB and FNGS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PKB or FNGS?

FNGS has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to PKB (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, PKB or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 19.76% vs 16.59% for PKB. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PKB or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 16.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PKB or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PKB or FNGS?

PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between PKB and FNGS?

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.