PINS vs. HUBS
PINS (Pinterest, Inc.) and HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) are both stocks. PINS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while HUBS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PINS returned -21.59%/yr vs -18.40%/yr for HUBS. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PINS vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PINS achieves a -21.94% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -53.16% return.
PINS
- 1D
- -6.00%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- -21.94%
- 6M
- -22.24%
- 1Y
- -40.28%
- 3Y*
- -5.89%
- 5Y*
- -21.59%
- 10Y*
- —
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
PINS vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINS Pinterest, Inc. | -21.94% | -10.72% | -21.71% | 52.55% | -33.20% | -44.84% | 253.54% | -21.52% |
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PINS and HUBS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PINS and HUBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PINS:
$12.87B
HUBS:
$9.88B
PINS:
$0.50
HUBS:
$1.91
PINS:
40.78
HUBS:
98.67
PINS:
0.21
HUBS:
0.11
PINS:
3.12
HUBS:
3.00
PINS:
4.51
HUBS:
4.95
PINS:
$4.37B
HUBS:
$3.30B
PINS:
$3.49B
HUBS:
$2.76B
PINS:
$351.59M
HUBS:
$196.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PINS vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank
PINS
HUBS
PINS vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PINS | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.99 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.66 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PINS vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, roughly equal to the maximum HUBS drawdown of -78.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and HUBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PINS | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.70% | -78.99% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.63% | -68.09% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.72% | -78.16% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.79% | -78.99% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.33% | -77.94% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.34% | -23.21% | -29.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.29% | 40.95% | -5.66% |
Volatility
PINS vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is 14.23%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that PINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PINS | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 27.45% | -13.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 55.03% | -16.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.60% | 62.97% | -13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.83% | 55.02% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.16% | 50.98% | +10.18% |
Dividends
PINS vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PINS nor HUBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PINS vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinterest, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PINS vs. HUBS - Profitability Comparison
PINS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 768.96M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
PINS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported an operating income of -80.29M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
PINS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a net income of -73.59M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PINS and HUBS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to PINS (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINS dropped -82.70% vs HUBS's -78.99%.
PINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PINS and HUBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer