PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINS vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PINS vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINS achieves a -16.61% return, which is significantly lower than META's -4.85% return.


PINS

1D
4.45%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-16.61%
6M
-20.71%
1Y
-36.14%
3Y*
-3.60%
5Y*
-19.25%
10Y*

META

1D
0.74%
1M
3.74%
YTD
-4.85%
6M
-4.97%
1Y
-8.49%
3Y*
32.58%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINS vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
-16.61%-10.72%-21.71%52.55%-33.20%-44.84%253.54%-23.61%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-4.85%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PINS and META is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between PINS and META has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PINS:

$13.74B

META:

$1.61T

EPS

PINS:

$0.50

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

PINS:

43.56

META:

22.85

PEG Ratio

PINS:

0.23

META:

0.94

PS Ratio

PINS:

3.33

META:

7.50

PB Ratio

PINS:

4.82

META:

6.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

PINS:

$4.37B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PINS:

$3.49B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

PINS:

$351.59M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINS vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINS
PINS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINS vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINSMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.99

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.26

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

-0.55

-0.50

PINS vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINS and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINSMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

-0.24

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

0.32

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.56

-0.59

Drawdowns

PINS vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINS drawdown since its inception was -82.70%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINS and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINSMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.70%

-76.74%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.63%

-33.30%

-27.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.72%

-34.15%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.79%

-76.74%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.78%

-20.37%

-55.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.29%

-15.25%

-37.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.60%

15.52%

+19.08%

Volatility

PINS vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.79%. This indicates that PINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINSMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.22%

8.79%

+6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.65%

26.57%

+11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.32%

35.24%

+14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.82%

43.98%

+11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.22%

38.63%

+22.59%

Dividends

PINS vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PINS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.33%0.32%0.34%
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PINS vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinterest, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
1.01B
56.31B
(PINS) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PINS vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pinterest, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

72.0%74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%20222023202420252026
76.3%
81.9%
Portfolio components
PINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 768.96M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

PINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported an operating income of -80.29M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

PINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a net income of -73.59M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PINS and META have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINS has higher volatility (15.22%) compared to META (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINS dropped -82.70% vs META's -76.74%.

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINS and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer