PIEL vs. GCOW
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIEL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PIEL vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 14.77% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.71M | $12.72M | $12.45M | |
| $1.50K | $4.13K | $8.68K |
PIEL vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 12.32% | -0.43% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 14.77% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and GCOW is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GCOW
PIEL vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIEL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.61 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -37.64% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -0.73% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.82% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 10.99% | +13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 13.55% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 16.00% | +8.42% |
PIEL vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PIEL and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PIEL vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.58% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and GCOW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIEL and GCOW have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
PIEL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer