PIEL vs. FID
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PIEL tracks the Pacer International Export Leaders Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PIEL vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.78% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 19.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PIEL vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 14.89% | -0.43% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.78% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and FID is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FID
PIEL vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIEL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -39.79% | +25.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -0.91% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -8.39% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 10.15% | +14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 17.04% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 18.87% | +5.94% |
PIEL vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PIEL and FID have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PIEL vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.17% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and FID have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIEL and FID have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer