PIEL vs. FPXI
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - PIEL tracks the Pacer International Export Leaders Index while FPXI tracks the IPOX International Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PIEL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FPXI.
Performance
PIEL vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 25.19% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPXI
- 1D
- -5.68%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 25.19%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
PIEL vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 8.89% | -0.43% |
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 25.19% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and FPXI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
FPXI
PIEL vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIEL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.45 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and FPXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -55.78% | +41.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -7.20% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -20.25% | +16.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 24.14% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 21.71% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 21.26% | +2.85% |
PIEL vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIEL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIEL vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.64% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 1.13% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 0.67% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 2.09% | 1.34% |
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and FPXI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PIEL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIEL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.
FPXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PIEL and 0.70% for FPXI.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and FPXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer