PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.


PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIE vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%6.51%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and ULVM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.56

The correlation between PIE and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIE vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
ULVM

Technology

47.0%
13.1%

Industrials

16.8%
12.2%

Financial Services

14.4%
22.5%

Energy

5.4%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.1%
10.1%

Real Estate

3.6%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

1.4%
3.5%

Utilities

1.3%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
4.7%

Technology

PIE
47.0%
ULVM
13.1%

Industrials

PIE
16.8%
ULVM
12.2%

Financial Services

PIE
14.4%
ULVM
22.5%

Energy

PIE
5.4%
ULVM
3.4%

Healthcare

PIE
5.1%
ULVM
10.1%

Real Estate

PIE
3.6%
ULVM
8.7%

Basic Materials

PIE
3.2%
ULVM
4.1%

Communication Services

PIE
1.4%
ULVM
3.5%

Utilities

PIE
1.3%
ULVM
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.3%
ULVM
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.4%
ULVM
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIE vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIEULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.47

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

4.50

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.52

18.64

+4.88

PIE vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIEULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

2.71

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.74

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.58

-0.46

Drawdowns

PIE vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-40.71%

-32.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-6.47%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-18.14%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.32%

-19.77%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.13%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-5.75%

-20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.56%

+1.45%

Volatility

PIE vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

2.96%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

7.97%

+9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.91%

10.74%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

15.48%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

18.86%

+2.49%

PIE vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and ULVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 7.01% for PIE. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.

PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.20% for ULVM.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer