PIE vs. ULVM
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PIE tracks the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PIE returned 7.01%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
PIE vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 6.51% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and ULVM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PIE and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
ULVM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
ULVM
Industrials
PIE
ULVM
Financial Services
PIE
ULVM
Energy
PIE
ULVM
Healthcare
PIE
ULVM
Real Estate
PIE
ULVM
Basic Materials
PIE
ULVM
Communication Services
PIE
ULVM
Utilities
PIE
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
PIE
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
ULVM
PIE vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIE | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.47 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 4.50 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.52 | 18.64 | +4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIE | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 2.71 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.74 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.58 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
PIE vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -40.71% | -32.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -6.47% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -18.14% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -19.77% | -20.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.13% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -5.75% | -20.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.56% | +1.45% |
Volatility
PIE vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 2.96% | +6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 7.97% | +9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 10.74% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 15.48% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 18.86% | +2.49% |
PIE vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and ULVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 7.01% for PIE. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.
PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.20% for ULVM.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer