PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PIE has outperformed DGS with an annualized return of 8.78%, while DGS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.


PIE

1D
2.05%
1M
-6.22%
6M
19.42%
YTD
29.63%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
2.57%

DGS

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.08%
6M
1.74%
YTD
9.26%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
8.04%
ALL TIME*
4.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.65M$2.61M$2.99M
$1.91M$4.11M$2.85M

PIE vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
29.63%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
9.26%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and DGS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.85

The correlation between PIE and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIE vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEDGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.68

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

4.93

+5.70

PIE vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIE vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than DGS's maximum drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and DGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-61.83%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-10.06%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-19.31%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-24.86%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-44.08%

+3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.32%

-6.41%

-4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.90%

-12.51%

-13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.41%

+0.93%

Volatility

PIE vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a higher volatility of 12.33% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.64%. This indicates that PIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.33%

5.64%

+6.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

15.50%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

17.44%

+9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

15.34%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

17.35%

+4.52%

PIE vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DGS's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.92%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.87%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and DGS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to DGS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs DGS's -61.83%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 8.78% vs 8.04% for DGS. On fees, DGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.87% for PIE.

PIE is categorized as Momentum, while DGS is Dividend. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.58% for DGS.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and DGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer