PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 7.59% return.


DGS

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.05%
6M
0.93%
YTD
8.16%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
4.63%

AVES

1D
-0.75%
1M
-4.02%
6M
0.78%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.66M$7.29M$6.23M
$2.57M$2.59M$2.98M

DGS vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
8.16%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%0.90%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
7.59%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and AVES is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.92

The correlation between DGS and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGS vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGSAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.44

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

4.35

+0.22

DGS vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGS vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-27.40%

-34.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-12.90%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-18.50%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-9.48%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-7.66%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

4.26%

-0.87%

Volatility

DGS vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) is 5.55%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that DGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

6.96%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.52%

18.01%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

20.01%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

17.49%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.49%

-0.15%

DGS vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than AVES's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.59%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.96%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DGS and AVES move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVES has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to DGS (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs AVES's -27.40%.

On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 14.88% vs 11.49% for DGS. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.59% for AVES.

DGS is categorized as Dividend, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.36% for AVES.

AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer