PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGS having a 16.30% return and AVDV slightly lower at 15.88%.


DGS

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.28%
YTD
16.30%
6M
17.62%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.20%

AVDV

1D
0.58%
1M
0.45%
YTD
15.88%
6M
16.04%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
16.30%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%8.02%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
15.88%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and AVDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.77

The correlation between DGS and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGSAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.41

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

13.59

-4.17

DGS vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGS vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-43.01%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-13.19%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-14.17%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-28.08%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.49%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-6.74%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.30%

-0.26%

Volatility

DGS vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 5.78%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

5.78%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

13.93%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

16.28%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

17.38%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.75%

-2.36%

DGS vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than AVDV's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
4.08%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.16%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS and AVDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGS has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to AVDV (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 14.52% vs 8.53% for DGS. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 14.52% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 3.16% for DGS.

DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer