PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYS vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYS vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYS has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 11.42%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.


PHYS

1D
0.19%
1M
-9.95%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-3.47%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
11.42%

VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYS vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
-3.85%63.95%26.43%12.98%-1.81%-4.84%23.89%18.14%-2.64%12.78%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and VWO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2010

0.17

Over the past year, PHYS and VWO have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYS vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS
PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYS vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHYSVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.21

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

7.80

-5.17

PHYS vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-67.68%

+19.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.80%

-11.17%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.80%

-17.37%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-32.60%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.80%

-36.39%

+11.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.43%

-2.68%

-19.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-15.80%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.60%

3.17%

+5.43%

Volatility

PHYS vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.64%. This indicates that PHYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

6.64%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.75%

14.04%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.17%

16.54%

+11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

17.48%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

19.22%

-2.81%

Dividends

PHYS vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYS and VWO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYS has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYS dropped -48.16% vs VWO's -67.68%.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYS and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer