PHYS vs. CEF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHYS or CEF.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between PHYS and CEF.TO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PHYS:
1.87
CEF.TO:
0.64
PHYS:
2.42
CEF.TO:
1.42
PHYS:
1.32
CEF.TO:
1.36
PHYS:
3.07
CEF.TO:
1.15
PHYS:
9.18
CEF.TO:
8.65
PHYS:
3.08%
CEF.TO:
4.22%
PHYS:
15.14%
CEF.TO:
56.82%
PHYS:
-48.16%
CEF.TO:
-62.22%
PHYS:
-6.69%
CEF.TO:
-5.94%
Fundamentals
PHYS:
$17.03B
CEF.TO:
CA$7.03B
PHYS:
$0.10
CEF.TO:
CA$1.90
PHYS:
3.34
CEF.TO:
18.35
PHYS:
$1.04B
CEF.TO:
CA$600.60M
PHYS:
$1.02B
CEF.TO:
CA$249.38M
PHYS:
$1.47B
CEF.TO:
CA$1.03B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly lower than CEF.TO's 36.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYS has underperformed CEF.TO with an annualized return of 7.64%, while CEF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.
PHYS
26.87%
-0.93%
12.15%
27.59%
11.32%
7.64%
CEF.TO
36.78%
0.90%
14.81%
36.83%
13.23%
10.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PHYS nor CEF.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEF.TO Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, smaller than the maximum CEF.TO drawdown of -62.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and CEF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is 5.39%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that PHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PHYS vs. CEF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold Trust and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities