PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS vs. KILO.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and KILO.TO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

PHYS vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%150.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
146.83%
117.80%
PHYS
KILO.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYS:

2.58

KILO.TO:

2.40

Sortino Ratio

PHYS:

3.18

KILO.TO:

3.06

Omega Ratio

PHYS:

1.43

KILO.TO:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

PHYS:

4.28

KILO.TO:

4.60

Martin Ratio

PHYS:

12.04

KILO.TO:

12.24

Ulcer Index

PHYS:

3.28%

KILO.TO:

3.05%

Daily Std Dev

PHYS:

15.35%

KILO.TO:

15.53%

Max Drawdown

PHYS:

-48.16%

KILO.TO:

-22.67%

Current Drawdown

PHYS:

0.00%

KILO.TO:

-0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 19.86% return, which is significantly higher than KILO.TO's 18.26% return.


PHYS

YTD

19.86%

1M

9.23%

6M

17.01%

1Y

38.10%

5Y*

13.20%

10Y*

9.32%

KILO.TO

YTD

18.26%

1M

9.10%

6M

16.31%

1Y

37.27%

5Y*

12.82%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS vs. KILO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

KILO.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KILO.TO is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KILO.TO is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KILO.TO is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KILO.TO is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KILO.TO is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KILO.TO is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHYS vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
PHYS: 2.17
KILO.TO: 1.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
PHYS: 2.74
KILO.TO: 1.88
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PHYS: 1.37
KILO.TO: 1.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
PHYS: 3.57
KILO.TO: 2.35
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 9.83, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
PHYS: 9.83
KILO.TO: 6.15

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the KILO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and KILO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.17
1.42
PHYS
KILO.TO

Dividends

PHYS vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHYS nor KILO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KILO.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.41%

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and KILO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril00
PHYS
KILO.TO

Volatility

PHYS vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is 2.96%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that PHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.96%
3.44%
PHYS
KILO.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab