PHYS vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

PHYS vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHYS vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust	7.33%	63.95%	26.43%	12.98%	-1.81%	-4.84%	23.89%	18.14%	0.88%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.

PHYS

• 1D: 3.81%
• 1M: -11.73%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 47.30%
• 3Y*: 31.85%
• 5Y*: 21.17%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHYS vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS

PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 84
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYS vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYS	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.82	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.25	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.71	-0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	10.04	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYS vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYS	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.82	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.09	-0.62

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and GLDM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PHYS vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHYS nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYS	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.16%	-21.63%	-26.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-19.14%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.80%	-20.92%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.41%	-13.19%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.07%	-6.04%	-15.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	5.16%	+0.17%

Volatility

PHYS vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) have volatilities of 11.34% and 11.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYS	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.34%	11.01%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.16%	24.07%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.55%	27.57%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.02%	17.65%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.25%	16.77%	-0.52%