PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and GLD is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

PHYS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.60%
12.28%
PHYS
GLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYS:

1.87

GLD:

1.91

Sortino Ratio

PHYS:

2.42

GLD:

2.53

Omega Ratio

PHYS:

1.32

GLD:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

PHYS:

3.07

GLD:

3.54

Martin Ratio

PHYS:

9.18

GLD:

10.08

Ulcer Index

PHYS:

3.08%

GLD:

2.85%

Daily Std Dev

PHYS:

15.14%

GLD:

15.01%

Max Drawdown

PHYS:

-48.16%

GLD:

-45.56%

Current Drawdown

PHYS:

-6.69%

GLD:

-5.98%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PHYS having a 26.87% return and GLD slightly lower at 26.64%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHYS having a 7.64% annualized return and GLD not far ahead at 7.96%.


PHYS

YTD

26.87%

1M

-0.93%

6M

12.15%

1Y

27.59%

5Y*

11.32%

10Y*

7.64%

GLD

YTD

26.64%

1M

-1.03%

6M

12.72%

1Y

27.80%

5Y*

11.67%

10Y*

7.96%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.871.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.422.53
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.321.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.073.54
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 9.18, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.009.1810.08
PHYS
GLD

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.87
1.91
PHYS
GLD

Dividends

PHYS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHYS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-6.69%
-5.98%
PHYS
GLD

Volatility

PHYS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.47%
5.21%
PHYS
GLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab