PHYS vs. PSLV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO).
Performance
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 7.33% | 63.95% | 26.43% | 12.98% | -1.81% | -4.84% | 23.89% | 18.14% | -5.33% |
PSLV.TO Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 3.31% | 145.62% | 19.39% | -1.85% | 2.50% | -13.71% | 42.04% | 17.10% | -6.50% |
Different Trading Currencies
PHYS is traded in USD, while PSLV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the PSLV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
PHYS:
$16.84B
PSLV.TO:
CA$19.29B
PHYS:
$12.73
PSLV.TO:
CA$5.19
PHYS:
2.78
PSLV.TO:
6.55
PHYS:
0.03
PSLV.TO:
0.03
PHYS:
6.95
PSLV.TO:
6.54
PHYS:
1.05
PSLV.TO:
2.07
PHYS:
$2.38B
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.95B
PHYS:
$4.38B
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.95B
PHYS:
$5.95B
PSLV.TO:
CA$2.94B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV.TO's 3.31% return.
PHYS
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- -11.73%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 47.30%
- 3Y*
- 31.85%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
PSLV.TO
- 1D
- 7.70%
- 1M
- -20.73%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 55.96%
- 1Y
- 110.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.26%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PHYS
PSLV.TO
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYS | PSLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.98 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 2.12 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.74 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 8.80 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYS | PSLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.98 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 0.65 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYS and PSLV.TO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PHYS nor PSLV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than PSLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and PSLV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYS | PSLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -41.53% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -39.47% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | -39.47% | +17.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.41% | -31.06% | +17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.07% | -15.35% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 12.69% | -7.36% |
Volatility
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is 11.34%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV.TO) has a volatility of 20.45%. This indicates that PHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHYS | PSLV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 20.45% | -9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.16% | 55.64% | -30.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.55% | 55.97% | -27.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 34.43% | -16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 38.35% | -22.10% |
Financials
PHYS vs. PSLV.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold Trust and Sprott Physical Silver Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities