PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYS vs. GOLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHYS vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 16.19% return.


PHYS

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
1.64%
6M
4.32%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.99%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
12.40%

GOLD

1D
-1.97%
1M
-7.53%
YTD
16.19%
6M
26.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYS vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
1.64%2.51%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
16.19%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and GOLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.51

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHYS:

$16.17B

GOLD:

$1.04B

EPS

PHYS:

$11.91

GOLD:

$3.06

PE Ratio

PHYS:

2.82

GOLD:

12.81

PS Ratio

PHYS:

14.95

GOLD:

0.04

PB Ratio

PHYS:

0.94

GOLD:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHYS:

$1.06B

GOLD:

$23.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHYS:

$3.03B

GOLD:

$169.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

PHYS:

$5.61B

GOLD:

-$162.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYS vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS
PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GOLD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYS vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYSGOLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

PHYS vs. GOLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYSGOLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.32

-0.87

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and GOLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYSGOLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-40.58%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.01%

-38.32%

+20.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.00%

-17.25%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

Volatility

PHYS vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYSGOLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

58.82%

-31.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

58.82%

-40.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

58.82%

-42.52%

Dividends

PHYS vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


Financials

PHYS vs. GOLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold Trust and Barrick Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
322.30M
10.35B
(PHYS) Total Revenue
(GOLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYS and GOLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYS and GOLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer